All Articles Website

Nonprofit Website Audit: What Donors, Funders, and Google Check Before They Trust You

Zoya SyalOctober 4, 20265 min read

A donor considering a first gift. A program officer doing due diligence before a site visit. Google's reviewer deciding whether the organization qualifies for advertising. All three open the same website in the same week, and all three are checking things nobody on staff has looked at in a year.

A website audit is not a redesign. It is a reading of the site through the eyes of the three audiences who decide whether to trust you, with a list of what to fix in order. Here is what each of them checks, the tools that show you what they see, and the fixes that matter most.

What a donor checks in ninety seconds

  • What you do and for whom, stated on the homepage in one sentence. M+R's Benchmarks study for 2026 found that 1.6 percent of nonprofit website visitors made a donation in 2025; the sentence at the top of the homepage is where most of the other 98 percent decide.
  • Proof it is real: an address, a phone number, real staff names, recent photos of actual work, and dates that are not two years old.
  • Proof it is trusted: a plain statement of results in numbers, partner names, and a link to your financial information.
  • A donation page that completes on a phone in one screen, with a secure connection, a monthly option, and no surprises. Our article on writing a donation page people actually complete covers it.
  • A way to ask a question that gets answered within a business day.

Our article on the nonprofit homepage that turns visitors into donors covers the page most donors judge first.

What a funder checks before the site visit

  • Leadership and governance: the executive director, the board, and how to reach the organization.
  • Financial transparency: the most recent annual report or a link to the Form 990, and a sense of where the money goes. Our article on the Form 990 and who is reading it explains what they see there.
  • Outcomes, not activities: what changed for the people served, with numbers and a date.
  • Current news: a recent article, update, or announcement that shows the organization is active.
  • Consistency: the legal name, mission, and figures on the site matching what the proposal says. A mismatch is a credibility problem before the visit begins.

What Google checks before approving the grant, and every day after

Google's website policy for Ad Grants is the most specific checklist any reviewer applies to a nonprofit site, and website problems are the top reason applications are denied. Google looks for a domain the organization owns, a security certificate on every page, substantial content that states the mission and describes the programs, working links and images, reasonable load times on a phone, no advertising, and no commercial content that outweighs the mission. Those same qualities are what Google's ordinary search and its AI summaries reward, so fixing them serves all three audiences at once. Our guide to getting a nonprofit website approved turns the policy into a working list.

The donor, the funder, and Google are asking the same three questions: Is this real? Is it trusted? Can I do what I came to do?

The tools that show you what they see

  • Your own phone, on cellular data, opening the homepage, a program page, and the donation page. Most of the audit happens here.
  • Google's page speed and mobile testing tools, which Google itself recommends after a website denial, for load times and mobile problems.
  • A broken link checker, run across the whole site, because every organization has links to pages that no longer exist.
  • Google Search Console, which reports crawl errors, security issues, mobile usability, and the searches that bring people to the site.
  • Google Analytics, for the pages people arrive on and leave from. Our article on Google Analytics for nonprofits shows which reports to read.
  • Searching your organization's name, in Google and in an AI assistant, to see what the world is told about you.

The fix order

  • Security and function first: the certificate, broken links, forms that do not submit, the donation page.
  • Clarity second: the homepage sentence, the about page, program pages that say who, what, where, and how to get help.
  • Trust third: financials, leadership, results, dates, photos.
  • Findability fourth: page titles and descriptions, headings that match what people search, consistent name and address everywhere. Our article on nonprofit SEO covers it.
  • Accessibility throughout: alt text, contrast, keyboard navigation, captions, which our article on website accessibility for nonprofits explains.

If the list is long, that is normal, and it is a reason for an audit rather than a redesign; most sites pass all three audiences after a month of fixes to what they have. If you hold Google Ad Grants or are applying, our Ad Grants audit includes a review of the site against Google's policy, in writing, within one business day. And the ongoing upkeep, from content to fixes to the monthly checks, is what our Marketing department maintains for organizations without a web team. See how our staff keep your site answering.

A quarterly twenty-minute check

  • Open the homepage, a program page, and the donation page on a phone. Submit a test gift or form.
  • Run the broken link checker.
  • Read Search Console's errors and the top ten searches.
  • Update the one date or number that has gone stale.
  • Confirm the name, address, phone, and hours match Google Business Profile and every other profile.

Questions nonprofits ask about website audits

Do we need a professional audit?

Not to start. The phone test, Google's tools, and a broken link checker find most of what a paid audit finds. A professional review is worth it before a redesign or an Ad Grants application, or when the list of fixes exceeds the hours you have.

How often should we audit?

A full read once a year, the twenty-minute check quarterly, and the phone test after any change to the site.

Our site is old but works. Do we need to rebuild?

Often not. Fix what the three audiences check and decide later. Our article on when to rebuild and what to keep covers that decision.

What is the single most common problem?

A homepage that does not say, in one sentence, what the organization does and for whom. Everything else follows from that.

Your mission is bigger than a website

The site is where three kinds of trust are decided in minutes, by people who will never tell you why they left. You do not need to become a web developer on top of everything else. You need a staff that is already running the checks, already fixing the pages, and already keeping the dates current while you lead the mission only you can lead. Find out what our staff can do for you.

Zoya Syal is Content and Production Manager at Nonprofits Engine, where she leads the content and testimonial work for a team that helps small nonprofits get set up and funded.

Start Now